Skip to main content

Conversion to std::string and return from function

 Many times I have come across code something like the below:

class AClass {

public:

    std::string getName();

};

std::string AClass::getName() {

    return "I am returning";

}

Here the member function converts the string constant to std::string while returning. This is in my opinion not necessary. This cast away some flexibility. I mean this way of converting to a std::string while returning to function does not make much sense. 

Reason: 

If we need in any place to get the name as const char* I need to reverse by calling string::c_str()

const char* pName = instanceOfClassA.getName().c_str();

However, keeping the return type as const char* has some benefits:

const char* AClass::getName() const {

    return "I am returning";

}

1. const char* pName =  instanceOfClassA.getName().getName(); // No Conversion will take place

2. std::string sName = instanceOfClassA.getName().getName(); // Conversion happens to std::string 

So, only based on usage conversion happens. It delays conversion until needed.

Now arguably, we can say that why not use c_str() to get something as const char*. I mean, let the function remain as below: 

std::string AClass::getName() {

    return "I am returning";

}

The usage may be like this:

const char* pName = instanceOfClassA.getName().c_str(); 

/*Other use of pName.... */

c_str() will return [internal buffer (C++ 11) of std::string as] const char*. But it's not reliable.

Why? The explanation is given in the link


In a line, to simplify it, we can't use data pointed by c_str() past the lifetime of std::string object or changed by a function. In both of those cases, the pointer will be invalidated. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

XOR (Exclusive OR) for branchless coding

The following example shows the array reversing using the  XOR operator . No need to take any additional variable to reverse the array.   int main(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { char str[] = "I AM STUDENT"; int length = strlen(str); for(int i = 0; i < ((length/2)); i++) { str[i] ^= str[length - (1+i)]; str[length - (1+i)] ^= str[i]; str[i] ^= str[length - (1+i)]; } cout << str << endl; return 0; } The above example is one of the uses of XOR but XOR comes in handy when we can do branchless coding  methods like butterfly switch etc. Sometimes this is very effective in speeding up the execution.  Let's see one of the uses of XOR in branchless coding. I am taking a simple example of Y = | X |.  Yes, I am generating abs of a supplied number. So, my function signature/definition in C++ looks like below: int absoluteBranch( int x) {     if (x < 0 ) {         return ...
1 comment
Read more

Power of Two

  I n this post will be discussing how to calculate if a number is a power of two or not. As an example, 8 is a power of two but the number 10 is not. There are many ways we can solve this. First , we will take an approach which is simple and iterative. In this case, we will calculate the power of two one by one and check with the supplied number. The below code illustrates it. bool isPowerofTwo(unsigned num) { auto y = 1; while (0 != y) { if (num == y) return true; if (num < y) return false; y <<= 1; } return false; } Second , assuming, the number is a 32-bit number, this is also an iterative solution. In this scenario, iterating all bits and counting the set bits. Any number which is a power of 2 will have only one bit set and the rest will be zeros. As an example, 8 in binary representation is 1000. Using this observation, we can implement an iterative solution. bool isPowerofTwo(unsigned num) { auto one_count = 0; for (auto index = 0; index < ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reversing char array without splitting the array to tokens

 I was reading about strdup, a C++ function and suddenly an idea came to my mind if this can be leveraged to aid in reversing a character array without splitting the array into words and reconstructing it again by placing spaces and removing trailing spaces. Again, I wanted an array to be passed as a function argument and an array size to be passed implicitly with the array to the function. Assumed, a well-formed char array has been passed into the function. No malformed array checking is done inside the function. So, the function signature and definition are like below: Below is the call from the client code to reverse the array without splitting tokens and reconstructing it. Finally, copy the reversed array to the destination.  For GNU C++, we should use strdup instead _strdup . On run, we get the following output: Demo code
Post a Comment
Read more