Skip to main content

Programming: Windows Threading Vs. Linux Threading (Part 4)

Thread Cancellation is a way where it's necessary sometimes to terminate a thread explicitly from another thread.
In Windows we have a Function, it's TerminateThread()
The function signature:
BOOL WINAPI TerminateThread(
  _Inout_  HANDLE hThread,
  _In_     DWORD dwExitCode
);

This function is always asynchronous. It never guarantees that the thread will always terminate by the time the function returns. This function never cleans up a stack of destroyed threads. So, it's not recommended to use this function until it's absolutely necessary.

Note: As mentioned by Jeffrey Richter, Microsoft designed this API purposely implemented this way to terminate thread(s). This ensures that other threads are still running and accessing the terminated threads stack will not get an access violation. So, by leaving the terminated threads stack in memory, other threads which are accessing the stack of the killed thread can continue to execute.

In Linux we have a function, it's pthread_cancel()
The function signature:
int pthread_cancel(pthread_t thread);

A thread may be in one of the three states with respect to cancellation.
a. Asynchronously cancellable - It can be canceled at any point in time in its execution. pthread_setcanceltype() is used to set thread cancellation asynchronous through PTHREAD_CANCEL_ASYNCHRONOUS. However, this is not recommended.

b. Synchronously cancellable - In this case cancellation occurs when it reaches a specific point in its execution. These places are called cancellation points.

c. Thread also can be uncancellable by setting PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE through pthread_setcancelstate(). An attempt to cancel the thread is ignored.

Thread cancellation in Linux this way may lead to resource leak if cancellation occurs in between but before resource de-allocation. We'll see how this can be handled in the thread to avoid resource leaks in the next article. However, destructors for automatic objects on the stack are run when a thread is canceled. The stack is unwound and the destructors are run in reverse order.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

XOR (Exclusive OR) for branchless coding

The following example shows the array reversing using the  XOR operator . No need to take any additional variable to reverse the array.   int main(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { char str[] = "I AM STUDENT"; int length = strlen(str); for(int i = 0; i < ((length/2)); i++) { str[i] ^= str[length - (1+i)]; str[length - (1+i)] ^= str[i]; str[i] ^= str[length - (1+i)]; } cout << str << endl; return 0; } The above example is one of the uses of XOR but XOR comes in handy when we can do branchless coding  methods like butterfly switch etc. Sometimes this is very effective in speeding up the execution.  Let's see one of the uses of XOR in branchless coding. I am taking a simple example of Y = | X |.  Yes, I am generating abs of a supplied number. So, my function signature/definition in C++ looks like below: int absoluteBranch( int x) {     if (x < 0 ) {         return ...
1 comment
Read more

Power of Two

  I n this post will be discussing how to calculate if a number is a power of two or not. As an example, 8 is a power of two but the number 10 is not. There are many ways we can solve this. First , we will take an approach which is simple and iterative. In this case, we will calculate the power of two one by one and check with the supplied number. The below code illustrates it. bool isPowerofTwo(unsigned num) { auto y = 1; while (0 != y) { if (num == y) return true; if (num < y) return false; y <<= 1; } return false; } Second , assuming, the number is a 32-bit number, this is also an iterative solution. In this scenario, iterating all bits and counting the set bits. Any number which is a power of 2 will have only one bit set and the rest will be zeros. As an example, 8 in binary representation is 1000. Using this observation, we can implement an iterative solution. bool isPowerofTwo(unsigned num) { auto one_count = 0; for (auto index = 0; index < ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Reversing char array without splitting the array to tokens

 I was reading about strdup, a C++ function and suddenly an idea came to my mind if this can be leveraged to aid in reversing a character array without splitting the array into words and reconstructing it again by placing spaces and removing trailing spaces. Again, I wanted an array to be passed as a function argument and an array size to be passed implicitly with the array to the function. Assumed, a well-formed char array has been passed into the function. No malformed array checking is done inside the function. So, the function signature and definition are like below: Below is the call from the client code to reverse the array without splitting tokens and reconstructing it. Finally, copy the reversed array to the destination.  For GNU C++, we should use strdup instead _strdup . On run, we get the following output: Demo code
Post a Comment
Read more