Skip to main content

Programming: Windows Threading Vs Linux Threading (Part 3)

Continued from Part 2:

In Linux, normally (when we use default pthread_attribute, aka sending null to pthread_create()), we're creating the joinable thread. There is another type of thread named detached thread, which We'll see later.

A joinable thread is like a process, isn't automatically cleaned up by GNU/Linux when it terminates. Instead, its exit states hang around the system (like a zombie process) until the thread called pthread_join() obtains its return value.

Let's see what happens in the Windows world:

When the thread terminates (the normal way, aka the thread function returns), it ensures the following :

1. All C++ objects created in the thread function will be destroyed properly via their destructor.
2. The OS will clean up memory owned by the thread's stack.
3. The system will decrement threads kernel objects usage count.

The following code snippet (GNU/Linux) shows a thread created using pthread_create() with default pthread_attr_t (aka null) as the joinable thread.

void *Print_Details(void *param)
     /*Cast the pointer to the right type */
      int    status;
      int       state;
      struct mystruct* p = (struct mystruct*) param;
      printf("Name: %s\n", p->name);
      printf("Thread: %s\n", p->thread);
      pthread_attr_t        pta;
      status = pthread_attr_init(&pta);

      // Get the thread state, Joinable or Detached
      status = pthread_attr_getdetachstate(&pta, &state);
      switch (state)
             printf("The thread is Detached\n");
             printf("The thread is Joinable\n");

      // Destroys thread attributes object and allows the system to reclaim resources
      // associated (if any) with the attribute object.
      status = pthread_attr_destroy(&pta);
      return NULL;


Popular posts from this blog

Reversing char array without splitting the array to tokens

 I was reading about strdup, a C++ function and suddenly an idea came to my mind if this can be leveraged to aid in reversing a character array without splitting the array into words and reconstructing it again by placing spaces and removing trailing spaces. Again, I wanted an array to be passed as a function argument and an array size to be passed implicitly with the array to the function. Assumed, a well-formed char array has been passed into the function. No malformed array checking is done inside the function. So, the function signature and definition are like below: Below is the call from the client code to reverse the array without splitting tokens and reconstructing it. Finally, copy the reversed array to the destination.  For GNU C++, we should use strdup instead _strdup . On run, we get the following output: Demo code

A simple approach to generate Fibonacci series via multi-threading

T his is a very simple approach taken to generate the Fibonacci series through multithreading. Here instead of a function, used a function object. The code is very simple and self-explanatory.  #include <iostream> #include <mutex> #include <thread> class Fib { public:     Fib() : _num0(1), _num1(1) {}     unsigned long operator()(); private:     unsigned long _num0, _num1;     std::mutex mu; }; unsigned long Fib::operator()() {     mu.lock(); // critical section, exclusive access to the below code by locking the mutex     unsigned long  temp = _num0;     _num0 = _num1;     _num1 = temp + _num0;     mu.unlock();     return temp; } int main() {     Fib f;          int i = 0;     unsigned long res = 0, res2= 0, res3 = 0;     std::cout << "Fibonacci series: ";     while (i <= 15) {         std::thread t1([&] { res = f(); }); // Capturing result to respective variable via lambda         std::thread t2([&] { res2 = f(); });         std::thread t3(

Variadic template class to add numbers recursively during compilation

 The idea of having a class to add numbers (variable parameters) during compilation time recursively. Also wanted to restrict types to a single type while sending parameters to class member function. That said, if we mix int, float and double types to add function shall result in compilation error. How do we achieve this. The below is the code which actually helps to achieve this: <code> #include < fmt/format.h > template < typename T> class MyVarSumClass{     private :         T _sum = 0 ;     public :         template < typename ... TRest>         T add(T num, TRest... nums){             static_assert (std::conjunction<std::is_same<TRest, T>...>{}); /* Assert fails                if types are different */             _sum += num;             return add(nums...); // Next parameter packs gets picked recursively         }         // Base case         T add(T num){             _sum += num;             return _sum;         } }; int main() {     My