Skip to main content

Variadic template function - Part 1

 In C, we know we have something called printf() function. This printf() function can take any number of arguments of any built-in type (not user-defined type). As an example, the following piece of code is valid for the standard built-in printf() function.

<Code>

const char* msg = "%s can accept %i parameters (or %s).";
printf(msg, std::string("Variadic templates"), 100, "more");

</Code>

The problem in this code is, it will not print the string part, but it gets compiled with the MSVC as well as GCC 8.2 compiler.

However, if I change the code like below, now it prints everything properly.

<Code>

const char* msg = "%s can accept %i parameters (or %s).";
printf(msg, std::string("Variadic templates").c_str(), 100, "more");

</Code>

The printf is like a variadic template function but it sticks to only built-in types. Now the question comes how can I write variadic template functions in C++. In C++ 11 the support has been added.

Let's start with a simple objective, which is to create a function that takes any arbitrary number of parameters of any arbitrary type and just prints them on the screen. As an example, the function shall look like below: 

PrintAllTypes(1, 'C', "Hello World", 0.67, 1.002);

Here goes the code for PrintAllTypes:

<Code>
void PrintAllType() { std::cout << "\n"; } /* This is the base case */

template<typename T, typename... Rest>
void PrintAllType(const T& current, const Rest&... rest) {
    std::cout << current << " ";
    PrintAllType(rest...); // This is a recursive call using pack expansion syntax
}
</Code>

Below is another variant of Print that takes any number of parameters but is limited to numbers only.

<Code>
void Print() { std::cout << "\n"; } /* This is the base case */

template <typename T, 
    typename std::enable_if<std::is_arithmetic<T>::value>::type* = nullptr, typename... Rest>
void Print(const T& current, const Rest&... rest) {
    std::cout << current << " ";
    Print(rest...); // Again, this is a recursive call using pack expansion syntax
}
</Code>

Let's try the addition of numbers via the variadic template function:

<Code>
template <typename T>
auto AddGeneric(T& t)
{
    return t;
}

template<typename T, typename... Rest, 
    typename std::enable_if<std::is_arithmetic<T>::value>::type* = nullptr>
auto AddGeneric(T& current, Rest&... rest)
{
    return current + AddGeneric(rest...);
}

// The Client code:
    int x = 10, y = 20; double dbl = 5.5;
    auto res = AddGeneric(x, dbl, y);
    PrintAllType("Add Result: ", res);
</Code>

The output: 
Add Result: 35.5

What if I have a number array and I need to use that array as an argument in a variadic function. One possibility could be using a functor to unpack the array and then use it for a variadic function. 

<Code>
template <typename T>
auto AddGeneric(T& t)
{
    return t;
}

template<typename T, typename... Rest, 
    typename std::enable_if<std::is_arithmetic<T>::value>::type* = nullptr>
auto AddGeneric(T& current, Rest&... rest)
{
    return current + AddGeneric(rest...);
}

/* Array passed to a variadic function. With the help of a functor unpacking the array */
template<typename Functor, typename T, std::size_t N>
auto AdditionByArray(Functor fn, T(&t)[N])
{
    return AdditionByArrayImpl(fn, t, std::make_index_sequence<N>{});
}

template<typename F, typename T, std::size_t N, std::size_t... idx>
auto AdditionByArrayImpl(F fn, T(&t)[N], std::index_sequence<idx... >)
{
    return fn(t[idx]...);
}

struct AddSupli
{
    template <typename... Arguments>
    auto operator()(Arguments... args)
    {
        return AddGeneric(args...); // This is same recursive call
    }
};
</Code>

So far so good. Will come back to this topic later.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reversing char array without splitting the array to tokens

 I was reading about strdup, a C++ function and suddenly an idea came to my mind if this can be leveraged to aid in reversing a character array without splitting the array into words and reconstructing it again by placing spaces and removing trailing spaces. Again, I wanted an array to be passed as a function argument and an array size to be passed implicitly with the array to the function. Assumed, a well-formed char array has been passed into the function. No malformed array checking is done inside the function. So, the function signature and definition are like below: Below is the call from the client code to reverse the array without splitting tokens and reconstructing it. Finally, copy the reversed array to the destination.  For GNU C++, we should use strdup instead _strdup . On run, we get the following output: Demo code

A simple approach to generate Fibonacci series via multi-threading

T his is a very simple approach taken to generate the Fibonacci series through multithreading. Here instead of a function, used a function object. The code is very simple and self-explanatory.  #include <iostream> #include <mutex> #include <thread> class Fib { public:     Fib() : _num0(1), _num1(1) {}     unsigned long operator()(); private:     unsigned long _num0, _num1;     std::mutex mu; }; unsigned long Fib::operator()() {     mu.lock(); // critical section, exclusive access to the below code by locking the mutex     unsigned long  temp = _num0;     _num0 = _num1;     _num1 = temp + _num0;     mu.unlock();     return temp; } int main() {     Fib f;          int i = 0;     unsigned long res = 0, res2= 0, res3 = 0;     std::cout << "Fibonacci series: ";     while (i <= 15) {         std::thread t1([&] { res = f(); }); // Capturing result to respective variable via lambda         std::thread t2([&] { res2 = f(); });         std::thread t3(

Close a Window Application from another application.

 This is just a demo application code to show how the WM_CLOSE message can be sent to the target process which has a titled window to close the application. To achieve this, either we can use SendMessage or PostMessage APIs to send required Windows messages to the target application. Though both the APIs are dispatching WM_XXXXX message to target application two APIs has some differences, these are as below: 1. SendMessage () call is a blocking call but PostMessage is a non-blocking call(Asynchronous) 2. SendMessage() APIs return type is LRESULT (LONG_PTR) but PostMessage() APIs return type is BOOL(typedef int). In Short, SendMessage () APIs return type depends on what message has been sent to the Windowed target process. For the other one, it's always a non-zero value, which indicates the message has been successfully placed on the target process message queue. Now let's see how can I close a target windowed application "Solitaire & Casual Games" from my custom-